Opinion

Dissecting the Falsehoods Surrounding Kenya Airways

By Business Day AfricaJanuary 28th, 2026
Dissecting the Falsehoods Surrounding Kenya Airways

Aircraft financing is a technically demanding subject that can puzzle even seasoned observers. The complexity deepens when distinctions between operating and finance leases are introduced.

For the uninitiated, the terminology alone can be forbidding. Where understanding is thin, conjecture often fills the void, sometimes innocently, sometimes as deliberate misrepresentation designed to conceal a lack of knowledge.

Kenya Airways (KQ) has recently been subjected to a familiar national pastime: the confident circulation of misinformation. Criticism of the airline has relied less on evidence than on a mixture of assumption, misunderstanding and invention. Yet KQ’s aircraft operating and finance leases have been examined repeatedly by reputable audit firms and scrutinised by parliamentary committees. They have been reviewed, re-reviewed and found to be in order.

Despite this, rumours persist. The latest—published without substantiation in a national daily, claims that these leases are inflated to enrich senior management. Such allegations endure not because they are credible, but because falsehood often travels faster than fact.

Understanding lease structures is essential. A finance lease closely resembles a mortgage: fixed payments are made over an agreed term, during which the lessee enjoys uninterrupted use of the asset. Upon settlement of the final instalment, ownership transfers to the lessee.

An operating lease, by contrast, is essentially a rental arrangement. The lessee pays foruse over a defined period, after which the asset reverts to its owner. As with a rented house, the user departs with no residual ownership once the contract ends.

Airlines, like most capital-intensive enterprises, employ a balanced mix of both lease types. This approach preserves financial flexibility, spreads risk, and allows carriers to respond to the industry’s sharp cycles. It also enables fleet expansion and renewal without locking scarce capital into a single financing model. It bears repeating that aircraft manufacturers are not benevolent lenders. They build aircraft for the global market; financing their acquisition is the responsibility of airlines and financiers, not the manufacturers.

Persistent rumours suggest that KQ’s lease arrangements are elaborate schemes designed to enrich politically connected interests and complicit managers. They are not. Claims that the airline’s finance leases are controlled by shadowy offshore entities collapse under even minimal factual scrutiny. Full details of KQ’s leases are publicly disclosed, including in Note 25 of the 2021 annual report and subsequent financial statements.

Particularly troubling is a recent article alleging that senior executives “steal” through aircraft leasing and that Kenya Airways is being burdened with Boeing 737 MAX aircraft at inflated rates, despite supposedly abundant cheaper alternatives. Such assertions betray a profound misunderstanding of the aviation market.

The post-pandemic recovery has left global aircraft and spare-parts supply chains severely constrained. Boeing and Airbus together carry an order backlog approaching 17,000 aircraft. Even an airline able to pay in full would typically wait seven to eleven years for delivery. The notion that fleets of discounted, immediately available aircraft are sitting idle is not investigative journalism; it is wishful thinking.

These distortions extend to the secondary market, where availability is scarce and pricing reflects demand. Lease rates are further influenced by an airline’s risk profile. Smaller carriers pay more than global giants with vast fleets and formidable balance sheets.

By international standards, Kenya Airways is a small airline. It lacks the scale of industry behemoths and cannot compete with state-backed carriers able to deploy unlimited capital. Aircraft leasing is therefore not a uniform market governed by equal pricing, a basic fact that should be understood before publishing claims that are not only unfounded but potentially damaging to the national carrier.

The writer is an aviation industry commentator.